Whether it is the richest versus the poorest or survival of the fittest; importance and power has always been based off physical possessions and prowess. The 18th century was no exception. Poor colonists of the time had little control over their own lives in government while the rich, plantation owning members of local government constructed the parameters of daily life in the Chesapeake Bay Colony. These parameters were set up according to the plantation owners needs. They did not take one moment to consider the needs of their fellow, poorer colonists. A few poor colonists felt that at least one of their needs was too great to be ignored, the need for land. The problem with this land is that it belonged to fierce, warring Indians which the wealthy government officials had already made pacts with promising to not touch it. This was a problem since these pacts were made without the poor farming colonists consent. The poor farmers in Chesapeake Bay were less able to get land due to the power and privilege of the upper classed government elite.
This need for land originated as the indentured servants of
The lack of sympathy for the need of poor farmers for land continued to be the prevailing issue as wealthy land owners controlled colonial government. This fact is expressed by a poor farmer named William Tyler, “Nether the governor nor counsel could or would doe any poore men right, but that they would shew favor to great men and wronge the poore.”(Roark 88) Wealthy land owning government officials had made several treaties with Indians to not take their land to prevent war and fighting between the natives and the colonists. This action taken to help the colonial town was actually solely helping the wealthy land owners who made it, and not the lower classed former servants who it affected the most. The evil was not in the making of the treaty itself, but making it without the consent of the majority of the colonists was. Another example of the apathetic view taken by the government of the poor's needs would be when the Indians attacked a local farmer's land and
Bacon himself had his own aggravations to bring against
Another ill-made decision by the wealthy government officials was the decree by Governor William Berkeley that prevented many colonists from trading with local Indian tribes. The purpose of this decree was so colonists would not trade arms with Indians so as to encourage peace. Lower class colonists however accused
What was unique about this rebellion was the white and black comradeship. Poor black and white farmers alike fought the upper classed colonists to obtain the land they wanted making no distinguishment between white and black skin. When wealthy plantation owners came to this realization, they realized they needed to make common ground with the white lower classed farmers so that their authority would never again be challenged in such a way. Slavery was the answer. After the rebellion slavery began to take hold in the colony and white men, whether poor or not, slowly became equal in superiority over black skinned farmers.
In the end twenty three dissenters were hanged for their part in the rebellion and King Charles II retired
Today people with more power constantly out rule those with less power and set up parameters and guidelines often according to their own desires. At the church that hosts the youth group I attend there is a youth room upstairs where we met when I first started attending the youth group. I had the most fun there that I had ever had at any church and I later became a Christian, largely in part because in that youth room we were able to have so much fun. That was the first time that I ever considered that worshiping God could be fun. Later the church decided that they didn’t want the youth meeting up in the room because they were worried about things getting stolen or broken. What they didn’t realize was that kid’s lives, like my own, were changed in that room. The worse part was that us kids, the reason the youth group even exists, had no say in the matter. They were worried solely about their own property and needs and payed no attention to the needs of those they hosted in their church building.
The class and position of a member of a society was seen in Bacon's Rebellion to also determine their consequent influence on the community. In Bacon’s rebellion, the case of class influenced whether or not the unwealthy colonists would get the land they needed from the sometimes vicious Indians. The authority they needed to sway the governmental powers in the colony to war against the Indians was not in their hands though they were the majority. Maybe the poor farmers were corrupt in wanting land that belonged to someone else, but the government was also corrupt for catering to their own personal interests above those of the colony at large. Those that have gained an importance will sway the laws, whether they be rich or poor. The rebels of Bacon’s rebellion also proved this fact as they made themselves important so that the governing elite could no longer ignore them. They fought long and hard to make their voices heard in a government run by the upper class.

6 comments:
I would suggest that you put a space between your paragraphs. You probably already know that though. There also seems to be a lot of excess information that may or may not be needed. Otherwise, great essay.
I think it's really good. I like the words you use to deliver your thoughts and ideas.
One thing is that if you are tracing the theme of class and social infrequencies, then your thesis needs to have a clear argument concerning that.
Good long essay, but I think you should make your thesis clearer.
It still seems like your focus is on the colonial expansion of the frontier rather than the opposition that is so heated between the two social classes.
There is some overwriting, ie additional, unnecessary words like "off OF" or "plantation owners OWN needs." Just try to streamline/ declutter to assist reading flow.
There's a weird class issue that then translates into land control/ ownership, and that leaves me confused as to whether or not you are addressing class or economy.
Without paragraph breaks that show up in the comment field, it is hard for me to determine how you are paragraphing or where your thesis is. Those scores are low based on this.
I only see 2 sources, and you do not recognize the author or why that source is important/ valuable.
Don't refer to the reader directly via "you" or "we" or any way, really. Just use your voice to tell your story and that is good enough.
This seems overly long...it just drags in the middle and really, without a clear thesis or clear topic sentences, is hard to follow.
Your voice is sort of here, in that I can see how you kind of take a position, but I don't see anything that says "Ian" to me. I'd like to be able to read this and get a sense of you as a person. This seems removed/ bored...
Argument / Thesis - NP
Organization - NP
Topic Control - NP
Use of Sources - NP
Source Relevance/ Quality - NP
Overall = NP
Proposed, revised thesis:
"The colonists in lower social classes were less able to get land due to the power and privilege of the upper class colonists in Chesapeake Bay."
Here are the adjusted categories based on our discussion:
Argument / Thesis - LP
Organization - NP
Topic Control - NP
Use of Sources - LP
Source Relevance/ Quality - NP
Overall = NP/ LP
Post a Comment